6

conception of the determination of anything by another without
it, of causality, that is to say To resolve this problem we
have been forced first to consider the object as also de-
termined by the subject. And this is to encroach already upon
the absolute boundary of I (&) not I. But even this (will not)
(do Even) the object itself does not determine the subject, (but only)
a false object does it.
* * * * * *
What shall finally say then? The theory that now
is is incomprehensible & self-contradictory hypothesis? Certainly not.
Nay, such a hypothesis is not intellectual by the very definition
of the intellect. It cannot be held in a comprehensible form but
it may be held.
The intellect did not make this hypothesis. The intellect makes
no hypotheses (,) which are incomprehensible. The intellect is not
therefore alone concerned in any proposition.
But we make it. All that the words convey is something in
capable of being made distinct. Hence it is emotional in its own
nature. And as an emotion it is justified.