10

OverviewVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

4 revisions
ims8be at Apr 22, 2019 01:53 PM

10

member of the hiplet is a member of the pair. Their manifestly aboard. But it shikes the mind as a different kind of absurdity from self-contradtiction, say like that about [Arthuer?] and the pictures. This impression [descrued?] eareful examination.
We emark that if the member of the triplet and or the pair were mere predicates or general subdivisions, there would be no absurdity. It is met [absured?] to say that every special [silence?] is either nomological, clasification, or descripline, and is at the same time either physical or [paychical?]; although to Aristotle this seemed impossible when The predictions were es-sential.
[Lerus?] see [heir?] if mill lee is from that graph me [remone?] the [jimetimes?] and [simply?]

10

member of the hiplet is a member of the pair. Their manifestly aboard. But it shikes the mind as a different kind of absurdity from self-contradtiction, say like that about [Arthuer?] and the pictures. This impression [descrued?] eareful examination.
We emark that if the member of the triplet and or the pair were mere predicates or general subdivisions, there would be no absurdity. It is met [absured?] to say that every special [silence?] is either nomological, clasification, or descripline, and is at the same time either physical or [paychical?]; although to Aristotle this seemed impossible when The predictions were es-sential.
[Lerus?] see [heir?] if mill lee is from that graph me [remone?] the [jimetimes?] and [simply?]