10

OverviewVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

4 revisions
Lilith27 at May 03, 2020 03:03 AM

10

member of the triplet is a member of the pair. That is manifestly absurd. But it strikes the mind as a different kind of absurdity from a self-contradiction, say like that about Arthur and the pictures. This impression deserves careful examination.

We remark that if the member of the triplet and or the pair were mere predicates or general subdivisions, there would be no absurdity. It is not
absurd to say that every special science is either nomological, classificator, or descriptive, and is at the same time either physical or psychical; although to Aristotle this seemed impossible when the predictions were es-
sential.

Let us see how it will be if from that graph we remove the junctures and simply

10

member of the triplet is a member of the pair. That is manifestly absurd. But it strikes the mind as a different kind of absurdity from a self-contradiction, say like that about Arthur and the pictures. This impression deserves careful examination.

We remark that if the member of the triplet and or the pair were mere predicates or general subdivisions, there would be no absurdity. It is not
absurd to say that every special science is either nomological, classificator, or descriptive, and is at the same time either physical or psychical; although to Aristotle this seemed impossible when the predictions were es-
sential.

Let us see how it will be if from that graph we remove the junctures and simply