Mount Auburn Cemetery

OverviewStatisticsSubjectsWorks List

Pages That Mention Lot 554

1859 Trustees Meeting Minutes, Volume 3, 1831.005.003

Trustees Records, Vol. 3, 1859 (page 135)
Indexed

Trustees Records, Vol. 3, 1859 (page 135)

135

Lot 543.

Lot of Mary Ann Keith deceased (543) Rep. by Henry A. Snow of Somerville, son in law of deceased.

Lot 554.

Lot of George Searle deceased (554) Rep. by Arthur Searle of Brookline, nephew of said deceased.

Lot 600.

Lot of Alanson Rice deceased (600) Rep. by Mary E. Rice of Cambridgeport, eldest daughter of deceased

Lot 633.

Lot of Elisha Goodnow deceased (633) Rep. by Jane R Goodnow of South Boston, widow of said deceased.

Lot 781.

Lot of John N Todd deceased (781) Rep. by Susan H. Todd of Cambridge, widow of said deceased.

Lot 836.

Lot of Simon Pearson deceased, (836) Rep. by Joseph H Pearson of Lunenburg Mass. second son of deceased.

Lot 887.

Lot of Cecilia Mc Bride deceased (887) Rep. by Sarah Parker of city of New York neice of deceased.

Lot 888.

Lot of John H. Brown deceased (888) Rep. by Annie B. Brown of Charlestown widow of said deceased.

Lot 1022.

Lot of William C. Bolles deceased (1022) Rep. by John A. Bolles Trustee, brother of said deceased.

Lot 1053.

Lot of Walter Miles deceased (1053) Rep. by Walter Miles of Boston, eldest son of deceased.

Last edit over 3 years ago by Elizabeth Casner

1879-01-27 to 1884-07-10 Copying Book: Superintendent's Letters, 2005.062.008

CB06_0030
Indexed

CB06_0030

30

T. Quincy Hill Esq

Dear Sir

The Treasurer requests me to inform you as to the condition of lot #554 (Searle) and I find it in very good order.

The bill for the ordinary care of the lot has been sent to Mr Searle but he has not as yet replied.

The bill sent you for "care & plants" $7.50 should have read plants $450 and top dressing with manure 2.00 instead 650; I have placed the differences to your credit.

Yrs truly J.W. Lovering

Mrs E. Munroe

Dear Madam

In reply to your note about the Charge for Myrtle on lot #2364, I would say that you are charged the usual price, and that for the last five years no smaller price has ever been charged for a single grave.

When Myrtle was put on your lot before, it was put on three graves at once and in those cases a small reduction is made, as it costs us less to do the work.

Hoping that this will explain the difference in the charges.

Respectfully J.W. Lovering

Last edit almost 2 years ago by gbenoit
Displaying all 2 pages