Page 1

OverviewTranscribeVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

7 revisions
RCH in KZ at Jul 06, 2022 05:27 PM

Page 1

[recto]

To the Honourable the Judges of Frederick
County Court now sitting --

The petition of Jacob Winter
of Frederick County humbly showeth that
on the twenty seventh day of July, in the
year, eighteen hundred and twelve, at
Frederick County aforesaid a Judgement
was rendered by John Huston Esquire
a Justice of the peace for Frederick County
aforesaid, against your petitioner in
favour of Jonathan Haslett for the sum
of twenty dollars debt with Interest
from date & one dollar, twenty six & 1/2
cents in a trial then and there had
before him the said John Huston
in which the said Jonathan Haslett
was plaintiff and the said Jacob Winter
was Defendant -- which Judgment
your petitioner avers is unjust and
contrary to the equity and right of
the matter & ought to have been in
favour of your petitioner, and
from which said Judgment your

Page 1

[recto]

To the Honourable the Judges of Frederick
County Court now sitting --

The petition of Jacob Winter
of Frederick County humbly showeth that
on the twenty seventh day of July, in the
year, eighteen hundred and twelve, at
Frederick County aforesaid a Judgement
was rendered by John Huston Esquire
a Justice of the peace for Frederick County
aforesaid, against your petitioner in
favour of Jonathan Haslett for the sum
of twenty dollars debt with Interest
from date & one dollar, twenty six & 1/2
cents in a trial then and there had
before him the said John Huston
in which the said Jonathan Haslett
was plaintiff and the said Jacob Winter
was Defendant -- which Judgment
your petitioner avers is unjust and
contrary to the equity and right of
the matter & ought to have been in
favour of your petitioner, and
from which said Judgment your