47

OverviewVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

5 revisions
jeffdown1 at Feb 07, 2016 05:06 PM

47

1908 Nov 11
Logic
31

Preserve. Wanted when corrected.

I go on to explain what I mean by one thing being Determined to Accord
with another. If a subject Μ possesses a character, μ, and if in any
kind of state of things that includes the actual state of things, if Μ
possesses μ, then so does ν, while if the actual state of things had not been
such that Ν would posses μ if Μ possessed it, then Ν would not have possessed
μ; or if Μ possesses μ, and the general state of things is such that in whatever more
special state of things Μ may possess μ it will likewise be the case the Ν
possesses the character ν although if the possession of μ by M had not
so entailed the possession of ν by Ν, Ν would not have possessed ν; or
if the following five conditions are fulfilled, namely, 1st, that L possesses the character λ,
2nd, that the existing state of things is of such a kind that every more specific state of things in
which L should possesses the character λ, would be a state of things in which Ν would possess
the character v, 3rd, that the actual state of things is such that whenever the second

47

1908 Nov 11
Logic
31

Preserve. Wanted when corrected.

I go on to explain what I mean by one thing being Determined to Accord
with another. If a subject Μ possesses a character, μ, and if in any
kind of state of things that includes the actual state of things, if Μ
possesses μ, then so does ν, while if the actual state of things had not been
such that Ν would posses μ if Μ possessed it, then Ν would not have possessed
μ; or if Μ possesses μ, and the general state of things is such that in whatever more
special state of things Μ may possess μ it will likewise be the case the Ν
possesses the character ν although if the possession of μ by M had not
so entailed the possession of ν by Ν, Ν would not have possessed ν; or
if the following five conditions are fulfilled, namely, 1st, that L possesses the character λ,
2nd, that the existing state of things is of such a kind that every more specific state of things in
which L should possesses the character λ, would be a state of things in which Ν would possess
the character v, 3rd, that the actual state of things is such that whenever the second