54

1906 Nov 13
Logic
36

acquainted in order to interpret this assertion. Does not all that
I have so far said about the Subjects of assertions seem
to you to be true?

You. I do not know. What should you say were the two or
more proper names that form a part of , or are connected with, the
assertion that all blood is red?

I. This assertion virtually gives a direction for finding one
of the Subjects, but still two Proper Names are connected with it. The
direction to the Interpreter is to take whatever he pleases for one
Subject; the Interpreter having made is selection, the assertion
is that if that Subject possesses the character of blood, it possesses
the character of redness. Both these characters being conceived as
single are virtually denoted by Proper Names.

1906 Nov 13
Logic
36

acquainted in order to interpret this assertion. Does not all that
I have so far said about the Subjects of assertions seem
to you to be true?

You. I do not know. What should you say were the two or
more proper names that form a part of , or are connected with, the
assertion that all blood is red?

I. This assertion virtually gives a direction for finding one
of the Subjects, but still two Proper Names are connected with it. The
direction to the Interpreter is to take whatever he pleases for one
Subject; the Interpreter having made is selection, the assertion
is that if that Subject possesses the character of blood, it possesses
the character of redness. Both these characters being conceived as
single are virtually denoted by Proper Names.