53

56

I will only say this. The relation is per se
possible. It only supposes that certain individuals
shall have special one-sided
connections. Now every two individuals
have special one sided connections. Neither
can any limitation of existence render
this form of relation self contradictory.
Therefore, Cantor is right. This cannot
be clear to you. It is the merest hint.
But I might give you several lectures elucidating
this matter. I must hurry on to other things.

Having made it clear what a collection is,
the next thing I have to do is to define Multitude. If we
regard plural nouns, such as men, horses,
trolley-cars, as names describing sams

56

I will only say this.
The relation is per se possible.
It only supposes that certian individuals shall have special one-sided connections.
Now every two individuals have special one sided connections.
Neither can any limitation of existence render this form of relation self contradictory.
Therefore, Cantor is right.
This cannot be clear to you.
It is the merest hint.
But I might give you several lectures elucidating this matter.
I must hurry on to other things.

Having made it clear what a collection is, the next thing I have to do id to define Multitude.
If we regard plural nouns, such as men, horses, trolley-cars, as names describing sams