182

OverviewVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

2 revisions
laika at May 03, 2018 11:38 AM

182

9

it is so far from being true that every conclusion is drawn because the reasoner is disposed to believe is, that it is quite impossible that a conclusion should be drawn because the reasoner is disposed to believe it.

I wish to lead you to see that the defendents confound two disparate categories; the one an act, whose nature is either to exist perfectly definite, or else not be at all, the other, the meaning of a general mental formulation.
To illustrate the sort of blunder I mean drop a stone. [Drop it.]
What caused that stone to fall?
Anybody who should reply that it was the "law of gravitation" would fall into the same sort of confusion between a degree of a court and a sheriff's right arm.

182

9

it is so far from being true that every conclusion is drawn because the reasoner is disposed to believe is, that it is quite impossible that a conclusion should be drawn because the reasoner is disposed to believe it.

I wish to lead you to see that the defendents confound two disparate categories; the one an act, whose nature is either to exist perfectly definite, or else not be at all, the other, the meaning of a general mental formulation.
To illustrate the sort of blunder I mean drop a stone. [Drop it.]
What caused that stone to fall?
Anybody who should reply that it was the "law of gravitation" would fall into the same sort of confusion between a degree of a court and a sheriff's right arm.