115

19

Now this point on the sep denotes an existing individual.
I assume that our universe of discourse is the totality of all historical men.
We can hardly avoid interpreting the graph as meaning that if an individual man dies (say perhaps Enoch ot Elijak), the Bible errs.
So take this. It means that if there

-is a salamander (-is a salamander
-lives in fire -live in fire
be a salamader something lives in fire; and the meaning will not be affected by prolonging the outer line of identity to the inner sep.
If however we join the two lines of identity, thus,
(is a salamander
lives in fire
we can hardly resist the interpretation, 'If anything is a salamander that very same thing lives in fire, that is, whatever

19

Now this point on the sep denotes an existing individual.
I assume that our universe of discourse is the totality of all historical men.
We can hardly avoid interpreting the graph as meaning that if an individual man dies (say perhaps Enoch ot Elijak), the Bible errs.
So take this. It means that if there

-is a salamander (-is a salamander
-lives in fire -live in fire
be a salamader something lives in fire; and the meaning will not be affected by prolonging the outer line of identity to the inner sep.
If however we join the two lines of identity, thus,
(is a salamander
lives in fire
we can hardly resist the interpretation, 'If anything is a salamander that very same thing lives in fire, that is, whatever