EN119
Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.
2 revisions | Michael.Seidel at Nov 24, 2020 10:33 PM | |
|---|---|---|
119Logic IV. 126 There is a page 127 1/2 allow a distinctly better explanation of the dialogue being dedicated to this unimportant person that the hypothesis that Plato have been thrown in with him a quarter of a century before the dialogue was written. If the reader thinks the Theaetetus is as unreadable a dialogue as Plato could write, he cannot know the Parminedes. This concerns the One. A vast number of arguments, any one of which is far worse than other than any other of them, are adduced in support of the following positions: 1st, [?] the one is it cannot have parts (137CD), nor limits (137D), nor shape (137DE), nor place (138AB), nor motion, [neither?] or revolution or translation (138CDE), nor rest (139B-140B), nor equality, nor inequality of size (140B-D), or of age nor time (140E-141E). But these are only modes of being; so that it is absurd to suppose that the One is [illegible?](142A). All this leaves us with the impression that a lot of very trivial reasons have been given for holding that some | 119 |