8

OverviewVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

2 revisions
kheilajones at Jan 26, 2019 05:53 PM

8

Logic IV. 19.
foot note continued

classical and new Testament word for conscience) synesis (which Plato derives from [?] together but Aristotle implicitly from [?] to apprehend meaning) gnome, eugnomosyne, etc. The five terms [?][?][?][?][?] of which the two first and two last were in common use among the scholastics from Albertus magnus [?] are carefully descibed by Aristotle in the 6th book of the Nicomachean Ethico chapters ix-xii. Only the last two need be considered here. Synesis is not a very frequent work. In Aristotle it is applied to the moral sense only in a particular applicaton. In general it seems to mean an immediate perception of an individual existing object but not a sense-perception but rather a synopathetic appreciation. Thus according to the doctrine of [Empedocles?] discussed [DeAnima A.V.?] like is know only by like and thus the soul must be a mist of all elements. Now to this kind of knowledge (10, 410 b 3) the name synesis is applied. In

8

Logic IV. 19.
foot note continued

classical and new Testament word for conscience) synesis (which Plato derives from [?] together but Aristotle implicitly from [?] to apprehend meaning) gnome, eugnomosyne, etc. The five terms [?][?][?][?][?] of which the two first and two last were in common use among the scholastics from Albertus magnus [?] are carefully descibed by Aristotle in the 6th book of the Nicomachean Ethico chapters ix-xii. Only the last two need be considered here. Synesis is not a very frequent work. In Aristotle it is applied to the moral sense only in a particular applicaton. In general it seems to mean an immediate perception of an individual existing object but not a sense-perception but rather a synopathetic appreciation. Thus according to the doctrine of [Empedocles?] discussed [DeAnima A.V.?] like is know only by like and thus the soul must be a mist of all elements. Now to this kind of knowledge (10, 410 b 3) the name synesis is applied. In