36

Overview Versions Help

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is ~~highlighted in red~~, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

2 revisions	laika at Mar 16, 2018 03:58 PM	Compared with
Mar 16, 2018 laika Nov 19, 2016 jeffdown1	36 Logic 36 hypothesis. Adopting that idea the logical argument only represents the last past of thought for the reason that it supposes a premiss which represents some attitude of thought which can only have resulted from thinking. Now if you only break off the last part of time you leave a previous time. If you break off the last part of this you still leave a previous time and there is no possibility of your breaking off so many last pieces that from what remains no last piece can be broken off. Hence there is no necessity for a series of arguments representing a course of thought to have a first argument before which there was no argument in the thought in the only sense in which there waa any argument at all in the process of thinking. For there is no fact in our possession to forbid our supposing that the thinking	36

36

2 revisions

36

36