344

OverviewVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

3 revisions
gnox at Oct 28, 2018 02:44 PM

344

πλ 91

and erasure of the ‘woman’ outside by the first permission, we
get Fig. 9 which asserts that any catholic there may be adores
some woman or other.

The third Permission is that any even-numbered Nest of Cuts, one
within another with nothing scribed between except ligatures from the outside to the inside,
may be substituted for any other (no Cut
being considered as Nest of zero cuts,) around any Graph-instance.
Such substitution is of course either an insertion or an
omission.

Let us now consider the interpretation of ligatures. For that purpose
I first note that the Entire Graph of any recto Area is a wholly particular and
affirmative proposition or a copulation of such propositions. By wholly
particular, I mean that every Subject (and every grammatical object) is an
indesignate individual. The Entire Graph of any verso area is a wholly universal

344

πλ 91

Let us now consider the interpretation of ligatures. For that pur-
pose I first note that the Entire Graph of any _recto_ Area is a wholly particular and
affirmative proposition or a copulation of such propositions. By wholly
particular, I mean that every Subject (and every grammatical object) is an
indesignate individual. The Entire Graph of any _verso_ area is a wholly univer-