29

Overview Versions Help

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is ~~highlighted in red~~, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

2 revisions	logiebear at Oct 30, 2020 04:29 PM	Compared with
Oct 30, 2020 logiebear May 31, 2013 Ben W. Brumfield	29 interpretant is trefiss or trefissile. It is very easy to distinguish the interpretant as actually acted upon from the interpretant as ammounted in the sign or as representing the sign to be a sign; but it is not so easy sharply to distinguish these two from each other. In the actual interpretant [??] be divided into the actual interpretant in thse features in which it is a determination of its field of representation or the actual interpretant in those features in where [??] on by the sign. The representative interpretant is either the interpretant as the sign designs it to represent the sign to be related to its object, the interpretant as it actually does represent the sign to be related to its object, and the interpretant as it ought to be present this sign to be related to its object. For example, a proposition or other assentory? sign, such as a portrait with a legend telling of when it is the portrait, whichthather dici sign in itself [??] intends its interpretant to represent it in its [??] as being in really related to its external object	29 interpretant is trefiss or trefissile. It is very easy to distinguish the interpretant as actually acted upon from the interpretant as ammounted in the sign or as representing the sign to be a sign; but it is not so easy sharply to distinguish these two from each other. In the actual interpretant [??] be divided into the actual interpretant in thse features in which it is a determination of its field of representation or the actual interpretant in those features in where [??] on by the sign. The representative interpretant is either the interpretant as the sign designs it to represent the sign to be related to its object, the interpretant as it actually does represent the sign to be related to its object, and the interpretant as it ought to be present this sign to be related to its object. For example, a proposition or other assentory? sign, such as a portrait with a legend telling of when it is the portrait, whichthather dici sign in itself [??] intends its interpretant to represent it in its [??] as being in really related to its external object

29

2 revisions

29

29