2

Overview Versions Help

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is ~~highlighted in red~~, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

3 revisions	agerdom at Jul 21, 2019 11:13 PM	Compared with
Jul 21, 2019 agerdom Sep 13, 2016 Huda Jan 20, 2016 jeffdown1	2 18r 33 Whatever is a common character of many things devoted by M is likely to be a character of m. That does not quite [fit ??] the [ferish ??] It does not contain the idea that the things must have been taken at random out of those devoted by M. In what [point ??] of view shall we regard this necessity for a random selection? Suppose we look at the matter thus. Certain things have a certain character in common. It follows that these must be some genus of these things which have the character. We cannot take any genus lower [than ??] that which they are selected as belonging to. To take a higher one would involve a perfectly arbitrary [povfoition]. I am convinced that this is a very awkward way of taking hold of the matter. Suppose we take it up another way for any subject or predicate we can substitute what?	2 18r 33 Whatever is a common character of many things devoted by M is likely to be a character of m. That does not quite [fit ??] the [ferish ??] It does not contain the idea that the things must have been taken at random out of those devoted by M. In what [point ??] of view shall we regard this necessity for a random selection? Suppose we look at the matter thus. Certain things have a certain character in common. It follows that these must be some genus of these things which have the character. We cannot take any genus lower [than ??] that which they are selected as belonging to. To take a higher one would involve a perfectly arbitrary [povfoition]. I am convinced that this is a very awkward way of taking hold of the matter. Suppose we take it up another way for any subject or predicate we can substitute what?

2

3 revisions

2

2