12

OverviewVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

2 revisions
MarlowScribes at Dec 26, 2020 03:21 AM

12

22r

41

All U is the foresent U

All U is P

therefore

All [Dr?] U is P

No rather

The foresent U is U

The present U is P

therefore All U is P


Now we have why not then
All S is S S S' S" are taken as U
Some S is M therefore M is S or S' or S"
Some M is S S S' S" is P
therefore U is P

Why yes! This is it.

Induction consists in that very conversion which Aristotle says is necessary [Dr?] its validity.

The inference is _

2 that if - S S'S" occur only in consequence of being M

2' then All U has the common characters of S S' S"

Some S is M

Zen _ now to hypothesis * Fig 2

36