11
Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.
2 revisions | noamsol at Sep 18, 2018 04:33 PM | |
---|---|---|
11(1) would be a sign of nothing or a [why? copy?] of being which are undetermined to be representations. (9) would be being supposing it were not known to be, or (3) would be nothing A being which is [nil?] would be a nothing which is unopposed to anything We will now take up the cases where the implication = ∞ (12) is being of which some determinate quality is supposed to (8) is a (13) is being which is supposed to have all attributes. (11) would purport to be a complete list of all beings. (5) would purport to be a complete conjunction of all attributes. What has just been said [and? ∝?] the perfect balance of extension | 11(1) would be a sign of nothing or a [why? copy?] of being which are undetermined to be representations. (9) would be being supposing it were not known to be, or (3) would be nothing A being which is [nil?] would be a nothing which is unopposed to anything We will now take up the cases where the implication = ∞ (12) is being of which some determinate quality is supposed to (8) is a (13) is being which is supposed to have all attributes. (11) would purport to be a complete list of all beings. (5) would purport to be a complete conjunction of all attributes. What has just been said [and? ∝?] the perfect balance of extension |