14

OverviewVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

2 revisions
jeffdown1 at Jan 21, 2016 06:41 AM

3

The same intensive relation subsists between
(No A is B
& The (reverse?) of A is not B.)

{A is somewhat B
The reverse of A is B.

(The Reverse is not)

And the following are contradictory

({The reverse of A is B
The Reverse of A is not B)

(figure: note use of colored lines)

The following is important:
Since the reverse of A connotes all that A does not connote; A must be
determined in every respect (that is must be an individual) or else
the reverse will connote contradictory attributes & hso have no extent. And,
there, there is no reverse of a particular since there is no particular of
an individual. Consequently reverses are singular judgments.
Since the negative of (A) B denotes all that (A) B does note denote; (A) B must have a
definite sphere (that is must be a simple attribute) or else its nega-
tive will denote heterogeneous classes & so have no intent. And
therefore there is no negative of a limitative since there is no (limit?).

3