11

(1) would be a sign of nothing or a [why? copy?] of being which are undetermined to be representations.

(9) would be being supposing it were not known to be, or
being considered abstractly of the fact that it is.

(3) would be nothing [????] which abstracting from the fact that
there is anything so that its opposition is taken away.

A being which is [nil?] would be a nothing which is unopposed to anything
hence being abstracted from the fact that it is is abstracted from all
that makes it differ from nothing abstracted from its opposition and vice
versa.

We will now take up the cases where the implication = ∞

(12) is being of which some determinate quality is supposed to
be known.

(8) is a nothing a contradiction in being implied that it exists.

(13) is being which is supposed to have all attributes.

(11) would purport to be a complete list of all beings.

(5) would purport to be a complete conjunction of all attributes.

What has just been said [and? ∝?] the perfect balance of extension
and comprehension here made manifest calls to our mind
the forms A E 10 of propositions are consider are modifications
of the primary form A in extension but A is contra-