5

OverviewVersionsHelp

Facsimile

Transcription

Status: Needs Review

Meaning 4
fact and not a question of thinking. Set A be the {carat: "factualization?"}premises of the conclusion then
Then he showed you that one thing clearly implies in its conclusion
was that 2=3. Therupon, you remember, you blushed and admitted that
through the reasoning entirely satisfied your mind, and you could see no {carat: "find no"}
[f...] flaw in it, yet it could not be sound; and that I know is just what
you would confess in analogous eased to-day. I know it, because I know you
to be so perfectly candid and free from any guile or [mond.r.us] false pretension. Now
if you reply that an argument's leading from true premises to a false conclu-
sion, though it is sure sign of its being unsatisfactory, is not what the
fallacious character consists in, I shall infer that you are either a Lawyer or a
catholic priest or some other character occupy some other position outside the pale of {carat: modern} sciences, which has
accustomed habituated you to satisfying the minds of others and, when, as far as possible, your own too with
distinctions like these and I shall ask you be obliged to ask you whether you conceive that this

Notes and Questions

Nobody has written a note for this page yet

Please sign in to write a note for this page