46

OverviewVersionsHelp

Facsimile

Transcription

Status: Complete

44

But there cannot be any compulsion that does not affect
any individual, and therefore there is nothing to
compel correlates to be non-A's and consequently
in some cases none will be non-As. But
now if we bring in the assumption that there is
no one-to-one relation in which every B stands
to an A, this result is rendered impossible, and
with it disappears the hypothesis of which it is
a necessary consequence; namely, that there is
no relation in which no relate has two correlates
and in which some B stands to every A. This
hypothesis being overthrown it appears then that there is such a relation in
which no B stands to two A's yet of which
every A is correlate to some B. But we have
only to exclude from this all but one of the relations

Notes and Questions

Nobody has written a note for this page yet

Please sign in to write a note for this page