63

38

into the same absence of any logic that the fallacious argument would lead to.
We should have no ideal of reasoning, and consequently no norm.
It seems to me that the logician ought to recognize what our ultimate aim is.
It would seem to be the business of the moralist to find this out; and that the logician has to accept the the teaching of ethics in this regard.
But the moralist, as far as I can make it out, merely tells us that we have a piwer of self control, that no narrow or selfish aim can ever prove satisfactory, that the only satisfactory aim is the broadest, highest, and must gene